Comparison
ππ€ππππ§ π¬ππ©π πΌπ£π ππ©β’π₯ vs Meta Silense TON
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels β audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
ππ€ππππ§ π¬ππ©π πΌπ£π ππ©β’π₯@rojgaarwithankitVerifiedMeta Silense TON@tonmetasilense
| Metric | @rojgaarwithankit | @tonmetasilense |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 1.3M | 2.5M |
| Avg views | 100,149 | 22,461 |
| Engagement rate | 8.0% | 0.9% |
| 30-day growth | -0.6% | -17.6% |
| Language | Français | Français |
| Category | β | fashion |
| Channel age | 3119 days | 1760 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics β we have no admin access to Telegramβs native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@rojgaarwithankit
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@tonmetasilense
Mixed signals
- Views are low relative to subscribers β possibly an inactive or inflated audience
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict β see the methodology.