Comparison
Trade Nobody vs Proxy MTProto | پروکسی
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @trade_nobody | @iproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 3.2M | 7.4M |
| Avg views | 18,717 | 666,262 |
| Engagement rate | 0.6% | 9.0% |
| 30-day growth | +0.0% | +0.0% |
| Language | English | فارسی |
| Category | crypto | — |
| Channel age | — | 2952 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@trade_nobody
Mixed signals
- Views are low relative to subscribers — possibly an inactive or inflated audience
@iproxy
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.